A survey of the age-friendly indicators of Kashan city, Iran in 2022

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Trauma Nursing Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the age-friendly indicators in Kashan City, Iran in 2022.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in four districts of Kashan City, Iran. Researchers randomly selected 80 locations and used a specific checklist for observation. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics.
Results: Outdoor buildings and offices scored a mean of 8.95±2.25 out of 20 (range 5-14, 95% CI: 8-10.05), indicating an average condition. Urban roads and transportation scored 6.10±2.34 out of 20 (range 5-10, 95% CI: 5.8-7.0), also showing an average condition. Parks and public spaces received a score of 7.57±1.5 out of 16 (range 6-11, 95% CI: 6.8–8.1), reflecting an average condition. Religious places scored 10.09±2.6 out of 12 (range 7-11, 95% CI: 9.2–10.3), indicating a good condition.
Conclusion: The majority of outdoor buildings and offices, urban roads and transportation, as well as recreational and religious spaces in Kashan City do not meet the necessary standards for an age-friendly environment. These findings highlight areas that require improvement to enhance the health, activity, and quality of life for the elderly population.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. World report on ageing and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
  2. Taraghi Z, Ilali ES. A Comparison of Older Adults' and Managers' Attitudes towards Age-Friendly City Indexes. Iran J Ageing 2018;13(2):236-249. doi:10.32598/sija.13.2.236
  3. Nabavi SH, Hatami ST, Norouzi F, Gerivani Z, Hatami SE, Monadi Ziarat H, et al. Prevalence of Fall and Its Related Factors Among Older People in Bojnurd in 2015. Iran J Ageing 2016; 11 (3):466-473. doi:10.21859/sija-1103466
  4. Moncada LV, Mire LG. Preventing Falls in Older Persons. Am Fam Physician 2017;96(4):240-247.
  5. Green G. Age-friendly cities of Europe. J Urban Health 2013;90 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):116-128. doi:10.1007/s11524-012-9765-8 PMid:22993036 PMCid:PMC3764270
  6. Chung S, Kim M, Auh EYY, Park NSS. WHO's global age-friendly cities guide: its implications of a discussion on social exclusion among older adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18(15):8027. doi:10.3390/ijerph18158027 PMid:34360319 PMCid:PMC8345595
  7. van Hoof J, Marston HR, Kazak JK, Buffel T. Ten questions concerning age-friendly cities and communities and the built environment. Build Environ 2021;199:107922. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107922
  8. World Health Organization. Checklist of essential features of age-friendly cities. World Health Organization. 2007. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/362949. [Last access from: 10 May 2023].
  9. World Health Organization‎. Global age-friendly cities: a guide. World Health Organization. 2007. Available from:https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43755. Last access from 29.2.2023.
  10. Lin LJ, Hsu YC, Kuo HW. The prospects and opportunities of age-friendly Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc 2019;118(3):655-656. doi:10.1016/j.jfma.2018.09.010 PMid:30366770
  11. Araee A, Nazmfar H, ezatpanah B. An Analysis of the Experience of the Old Friendly City (Case Study: Karaj City). J Geogr Reg Plan 2020;10(3-1):77-98.
  12. Karami B, Mahaki B, Mohammad Karimi Mazhin A, Alimorad Nori M, Tajvar M. An Age-Friendly City Indicators of Kermanshah Based on World Health Organization Model. Payesh 2023;22(4):1-15. doi:10.61186/payesh.22.4.387
  13. Zarghani SH, Kharazmi OA, Johari L. Evaluation of the "Age-Friendly" city indicators in Mashhad by focusing on the social-cultural indices. Hum Geogr Res 2015;47(4):673-688.
  14. Lopes PO, da Silva SR, da Silva TC, Fragoso YD, Zanesco A. Age-friendly city: future perspectives for the Brazilian cities. Dement Neuropsychol 2021;15(3):295-298. doi:10.1590/1980-57642021dn15-030001 PMid:34630917 PMCid:PMC8485639
  15. Khoddam, H, Dehghan M, Sohrabi A, Modanloo M. The age-friendly cities characteristics from the viewpoint of elderly. J Family Med Prim Care 2020;9(11):5745-5751. doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1098_20 PMid:33532425 PMCid:PMC7842487
  16. Morowatisharifabad MA, Tagharrobi L, Jambarsang S, Abbasi Shavvazi M. Age-Friendly City Indicators from the Viewpoint of Older Adults in Kashan City, Iran. J Aging Environ 2022; 36 (2): 156-172. doi:10.1080/26892618.2021.1898075
  17. Available from: https://www.irna.ir/news/85001941. [Last access date: 15 May 2023].
  18. Available from: https://www.karnaval.ir/map/kashan. [Last access date: 30 Jun 2023].
  19. Building Age-Friendly Communities. Government of Alberta April 2012.Available from:https://open.alberta.ca/dataset/dd383d73-d49e-4939-b153-6cff6bbe8220/resource/9c0f7144-18cb-455c-9be5-f2f8b928d497/download/agefriendly-checklist-2012.pdf.
  20. Rose MS, Koshman ML, Spreng S, Sheldon R. Statistical issues encountered in the comparison of health-related quality of life in diseased patients to published general population norms: problems and solutions. J Clin Epidemiol 1999;52(5):405-12. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00014-1 PMid:10360335
  21. Fallah H, Nazari J, Choobineh A, Morowatisharifabad MA, Jafarabadi MA. Identifying Barriers and Problems of Physical Environment in Older Adults' Homes: An Ergonomic Approach. Work 2021;70(4):1289-1303. doi:10.3233/WOR-210765 PMid:34864708
  22. Ceccato V, Willems O. Temporal and spatial dynamics of falls among older pedestrians in Sweden. Appl Geogr. 2019;103:122-133. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.12.007
  23. Močnik S, Moogoor A, Yuen B. Exploring facilitators and barriers of older adults' outdoor mobility: A walk-along study in Singapore. J Transp Health 2022; 26:101386. doi:10.1016/j.jth.2022.101386
  24. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/injury/features/older-adult-falls/index.html. [Last access date: 30 Apr 2023].
  25. Zhou M, Kuang L, Hu N. The Association between Physical Activity and Intrinsic Capacity in Chinese Older Adults and Its Connection to Primary Care: China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). Int J Environ Res Public Health 2023;20(7):5361. doi:10.3390/ijerph20075361 PMid:37047975 PMCid:PMC10094135
  26. Sala G, Jopp D, Gobet F, Ogawa M, Ishioka Y, Masui Y, et al. The impact of leisure activities on older adults' cognitive function, physical function, and mental health. PLoS One 2019;14 (11): e0225006. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0225006 PMid:31703115 PMCid:PMC6839878
  27. Lee Y, Chi I, Palinkas L. Widowhood, leisure activity engagement, and cognitive function among older adults. Aging Ment Health 2019;23(6):771-780. doi:10.1080/13607863.2018.1450837 PMid:29634291
  28. Rahaei Z, Rezaeipandari H, Jambarsang S, Norouzian M. How do Older Adults Spend their Leisure Time? A Population-Based Study in Yazd, Iran. Elder Health J 2022;8(2):82-88. doi:10.18502/ehj.v8i2.11547
  29. Vaishya R, Vaish A. Falls in Older Adults are Serious. Indian J Orthop 2020;54(1):69-74. doi:10.1007/s43465-019-00037-x PMid:32257019 PMCid:PMC7093636
  30. Pahlevanian AA, Najarian R, Adabi S, Mirshoja MS. The Prevalence of Fall and Related Factors in Iranian Elderly: A Systematic Review. Arch Rehabil 2020;21(3):286-303. doi:10.32598/RJ.21.3.2084.6
  31. Marston HR, van Hoof J. "Who Doesn't Think about Technology When Designing Urban Environments for Older People?" A Case Study Approach to a Proposed Extension of the WHO's Age-Friendly Cities Model. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019; 16 (19):3525. doi:10.3390/ijerph16193525 PMid:31547204 PMCid:PMC6801806
International Archives of Health Sciences
Volume 11, Issue 1
February 2024
Pages 62-68

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 09 August 2023
  • Revise Date: 25 September 2023
  • Accept Date: 10 October 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics