Clinician Satisfaction and Experience Using Teleconsultation during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Pakistan A Cross-Sectional Study

Document Type : Original Article


1 Ziauddin College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ziauddin University, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan

2 Department of Research and Development, AO Hospital, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan

3 Department of Physiotherapy, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan

4 Department of Pediatric and Child Health, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan



During the pandemic of COVID-19, the sudden change in traditional health-care providing systems, clinicians experience some positive and negative aspects of the approach. This study evaluates the clinician's satisfaction and experience with the use of teleconsultation provided during the pandemic of novel coronavirus and their willingness to continue telehealth after the pandemic.
Materials and Methods: 
A cross-sectional survey was conducted online during the peak pandemic of COVID-19 in Pakistan through Google Forms questionnaire from 115 health consultants on different disciplines and recruited through social media. The questionnaire contains 15 questions regarding clinician's satisfaction, quality of treatment, and intention to continue providing telehealth services after the pandemic. Descriptive and inferential statistics were obtained by analyzing the data using SPSS software version 20, USA.
One hundred and fifteen consultants, 28 males and 87 females participated in the study, in which 62% were found to have an average and 34% at a high level of satisfaction. The Kruskal–Wallis test showed a significant difference among different medical specialists in the continuation of telehealth services after the pandemic of COVID-19 (P = 0.003) and its recommendation to friends and family (P = 0.02) with high mean rank in endocrinologist and dermatologist.
A great number of participants reported a good response for the continuation in telemedicine services in their daily routine even after the pandemic situation. However, there is an urgent need to find the solution for the difficulties and drawbacks faced by health-care providers.


Al‑Wardha Zahoor [Pubmed] [Google Scholar]


1. Nerlich M, Schaechinger U. Integration of Health Telematics into Medical Practice. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2003.
2. MaederA, Ho K, MarceloA, Warren J. The promise of new technologies in an age of new health challenges: Selected papers from Global Telehealth 2016, IOS Press; 2016.
3. O’Cathail M, Sivanandan MA, Diver C, Patel P, Christian J. The use of patient‑facing teleconsultations in the national health service: Scoping review. JMIR Med Inform 2020;8:e15380.
4. Larcher B, Arisi E, Berloffa F, Demichelis F, Eccher C, Galligioni E, et al. Analysis of user‑satisfaction with the use of a teleconsultation system in oncology. Med Inform Internet Med 2003;28:73‑84.
5. Khan ZA, Zahoor A, Afzal I, Butt U, Siddiqui AM, Khan Z, et al. Evaluation of patient perception and satisfaction toward the use of telemedicine during pandemic of novel coronavirus in Pakistan. Telemed J E Health 2021;27:1174‑9.
6. Niznik JD, He H, Kane‑Gill SL. Impact of clinical pharmacist services delivered via telemedicine in the outpatient or ambulatory care setting: A systematic review. Res Social Adm Pharm 2018;14:707‑17.
7. Eibl JK, Gauthier G, Pellegrini D, Daiter J, Varenbut M, Hogenbirk JC, et al. The effectiveness of telemedicine‑delivered opioid agonist therapy in a supervised clinical setting. Drug Alcohol Depend 2017;176:133‑8.
8. Verduzco‑Gutierrez M, Bean AC, Tenforde AS, Tapia RN, Silver JK. How to conduct an outpatient telemedicine rehabilitation or prehabilitation visit. PM R 2020;12:714‑20.
9. WHO Director‑General’s Opening Remarks at the Media Briefing on COVID‑19 – 16 March 2020. Available from: director‑general/speeches/detail/who‑director‑general‑s‑opening‑remar ks‑at‑the‑media-briefing‑on‑covid‑19‑‑‑16‑march‑2020. [Last accessed on 2022 Jun 10].
10. Portnoy J, Waller M, Elliott T. Telemedicine in the era of COVID‑19J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2020;8:1489‑91.
11. McGee M, Potter C, Kane J. Are UK care homes ready for the telemedicine revolution? BJPsych Bull 2020;44:222.
12. Peine A, Paffenholz P, Martin L, Dohmen S, Marx G, Loosen SH. Telemedicine in Germany during the COVID‑19 pandemic: Multi‑professional national survey. J Med Internet Res 2020;22:e19745.
13. Esterle L, Mathieu‑Fritz A. Teleconsultation in geriatrics: Impact on professional practice. Int J Med Inform 2013;82:684‑95.
14. Acharya RV, Rai JJ. Evaluation of patient and doctor perception toward the use of telemedicine in Apollo tele health services, India. J Family Med Prim Care 2016;5:798‑803.
15. Almathami HKY, Win KT, Vlahu‑Gjorgievska E. Barriers and facilitators that influence telemedicine‑based, real‑time, online consultation at patients’ homes: Systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res 2020;22:e16407.
16. Annaswamy TM, Verduzco‑Gutierrez M, Frieden L. Telemedicine barriers and challenges for persons with disabilities: COVID‑19 and beyond. Disabil Health J 2020;13:100973.
17. Gajarawala SN, Pelkowski JN. Telehealth benefits and barriers. J Nurse Pract 2021;17:218‑21.
18. Gentry MT, Puspitasari AJ, McKean AJ, Williams MD, Breitinger S, Geske JR, et al. Clinician satisfaction with rapid adoption and implementation of telehealth services during the COVID‑19 pandemic. Telemed J E Health 2021;27:1385‑92.
19. Moffatt JJ, Eley DS. The reported benefits of telehealth for rural Australians. Aust Health Rev 2010;34:276‑81.
20. Ashfaq A, Memon SF, Zehra A, Barry S, Jawed H, Akhtar M, et al. Knowledge and attitude regarding telemedicine among doctors in Karachi. Cureus 2020;12:e6927.
21. Negrini S, Donzelli S, Negrini A, Negrini A, Romano M, Zaina F. Feasibility and acceptability of telemedicine to substitute outpatient rehabilitation services in the COVID‑19 Emergency in Italy: An observational everyday clinical‑life study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2020;101:2027‑32.
22. Fatehi F, Martin‑Khan M, Smith AC, Russell AW, Gray LC. Patient satisfaction with video teleconsultation in a virtual diabetes outreach clinic. Diabetes Technol Ther 2015;17:43‑8.
23. Grenier OuimetA, Wagner G, RaymondL, Pare G. Investigating patients’ intention to continue using teleconsultation to anticipate postcrisis momentum: Survey study. J Med Internet Res 2020;22:e22081.
24. Demartines N, Freiermuth O, Mutter D, HebererM, Harder F. Knowledge and acceptance of telemedicine in surgery: A survey. J Telemed Telecare 2000;6:125‑31.
25. Richards H, King G, Reid M, Selvaraj S, McNicol I, Brebner E, et al. Remote working: survey of attitudes to eHealth of doctors and nurses in rural general practices in the United Kingdom. Fam Pract 2005;22:2‑7.
26. White LA, Krousel‑Wood MA, Mather F. Technology meets healthcare: Distance learning and telehealth. Ochsner J 2001;3:22‑9.
27. Hall JL, McGraw D. For telehealth to succeed, privacy and security risks must be identified and addressed. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014;33:216‑21.
28. Luxton DD, Kayl RA, Mishkind MC. mHealth data security: The need for HIPAA‑compliant standardization. Telemed J E Health 2012;18:284‑8.
29. Fields F. “What if” scenario for telemedicine reimbursement based on ATSP/TT survey findings. Telemed Today 1999;7:32. Available from: [Last accessed 2022 Jun 10].